Yup, I also edited the beginning because that information was not necessary and you were right about it being misleading from the main topic.Yeah, well, you didn't have to do it just because it happened that I didn't understand your goal the first time, it's OK. Like I said, from my side, the examples were fine, it's just that it wasn't clearly written somewhere in the beginning that you wanted different parts of the image (contents, border, shadows) to be colored differently, that's all - it was mainly implied based on the results, if careful enough to notice. Then, the examples, even if fewer or vaguely related, would have made sense.
Don't worry, I didn't edit it because you didn't understand, I did it to make it easier to understand. While vaguely related examples may suit experienced guys like you, balala and eclectic, I made it thinking about less experienced people as well, like a walk through the why the technique could be useful. I believe it is important to understand the whys as well as the hows for a topic to be transcendent
I guess it's a normal thing that the experienced read over stuff and just don't get it (or just think they got it and move on) while the less experienced feel like there's missing information. So I was trying to balance it.
Well, that's hard to know given that nobody else has said anything yetBut again, that's just me, maybe others reading it got it the first time. Now it's perfectly clear based on our conversation anyway.
but let's hope it is 
Statistics: Posted by RicardoTM — March 25th, 2024, 2:48 pm — Replies 8 — Views 201